Friday, November 5, 2010

GM strengthens ties with Chinese partner


Summary

This article reports that General Motors has made a significant agreement with its Chinese partner SAIC Motor Corporation. These partners are planning to design new vehicles for global markets, such as a new generation of electric vehicles; the cost for research and development will be shared between the two. The SAIC officials have also expressed an interest in acquiring 5% of GM’s shares, but this was not confirmed by the GM officials. In addition to that, GM is expected to give more detail of its plan to sell shares to the public for the first time since it emergences from bankruptcy in 2009. If GM’s IPO (Initial Public Offerings) put its value higher than $66 billion, it’s likely for taxpayers to break even on the 2009 bailout. Thought some analysts forecasted GM shares would end up being worth between $64 billion and $80 billion, recent reports suggest its shares would only worth around $40 billion.

Connection

In chapter 2, we have analyzed different transactions. If the transaction for developing new vehicles is to take place now under the condition that GM’s partner agrees to share the cost for research and development of new vehicles, GM will have less expense and a higher profit (only if everything else stays the same). So we will debit expense and credit accounts payable because there will be less fees to pay; fees that are associated with new developments. If GM is to issue share now, the accounts that will be affected will be cash and common shares. We will debit cash and credit common shares, since there will be more cash for the company and shares are issued to the public.

Reflection

The agreement between GM and its Chinese partner will not only benefit GM, but its partner as well. The Chinese corporation, SAIC Motor Corporation, may have enough money to develop new vehicles, but they don’t necessarily have the technology and experience to do so. On the other hand, GM has the technology and experience, but GM lacks in cash. So when the two sign the agreement, it benefits both of them. When a new vehicle is developed, the Chinese corporation can manufacture it in its own factories and sell it within China or around the globe under the well-known brand name, General Motors. GM will also be able to gain profits from the sales of this new vehicle and they will have a stronger tie with the Chinese corporation, which manufactures many of their cars.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Forestry sector posts loss despite price spikes

This article reports that the Canadian forestry suffers a loss in the second quarter though prices for lumber and oriented strand board spike. The spike level was not seen since 2006, but only come crashing down by the end of the second quarter. One of the main reasons why the forestry suffers a lost is the fact that demands for building materials remains very low in the second quarter; a lot lower than industrial capacity. Another main factor is the strength of our Canadian dollar, which is 12 per cent higher than it was last year. The strengthened Canadian dollar counteracts revenues earned in U.S. currency.

Connection
The connection in this chapter is the practice of the three fundamental business activities: financing, investing and operating activities. These forestry companies have not successfully invested and operate their companies. When the Canadian dollar is high, instead of exporting lumbers to the U.S; they could have keep it to a minimum and encourage sales within the country. Or, they can keep the revenue in US currency and trade back to Canadian dollar when Canadian dollar weakens. While the lumber tax was eliminated due to the spike in price, these corporations could have finance and invest more in the production of lumber and encourage sales!


Reflection
As stated in the article, there was a brief elimination of lumber tax during the second quarter. The Canadian forestry should have used this chance to their advantage. They could have financed for a maximum production and sales of lumbers within and out of the country. Or they can import as much as lumber as they can to the USA or other places. Remember, with the elimination of tax, the price of lumber is lowered by 15%. Also, since the end of the second quarter is the beginning of school, the producers could have raised the price of line paper for higher revenue since there will be a high demand for paper! Why didn’t the forestry sector report positive earnings like the top four Eastern producers did??